What is the initial step to address discrepancies between expected and reported exposure levels of a technologist?

The initial step to address discrepancies between expected and reported exposure levels should focus on investigating potential dosimeter malfunction or misuse. This approach is critical because the dosimeter is a key tool used to measure radiation exposure accurately. If there is a significant difference between the expected and reported levels, it could indicate an issue with how the dosimeter is functioning or how it has been used by the technologist.

Starting with this investigation allows for identifying whether the problem originates from the measurement device itself or from how the technologist has been using it. If the dosimeter is malfunctioning, recalibration, replacement, or further testing may be required. On the other hand, if there is evidence of misuse, retraining could be necessary.

Addressing potential equipment issues before considering other actions ensures that any corrective measures are based on an accurate assessment of the situation rather than assumptions. By focusing on the source of the discrepancy first, it allows for a systematic approach to resolving the issue, thereby ensuring the safety and accuracy of radiation exposure reporting in the workplace.